Loading...
00070792STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 3 Project: CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PH2 (CUP)- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (1- 500061) PLANNING 1. No Comment. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 04/18/01 ENGINEERING 1. Reviewed by: Date: NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PH2 (CUP)- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (01 -061) PLANNING 1. Please show current zoning and ownership of adjacent properties. 2. If this property is not in the 100 -year flood plain, please make a note of this and reference the appropriate document. 3. Between Sheets C1 and A1.0, there is a discrepancy in the number of spaces in two rows of parking. 4. On sheet A1.0 you are claiming 63 new parking spaces, but you are only showing 57 new parking spaces on sheet A1.0 & C1. You are also showing on sheet A1.0 174 total parking spaces, but there are supposed to be 182. 5. On sheet C1, please remove the double lines in front of the proposed parking spaces. 6. The 6" Elms (Ulmus Crassifolia) protected are worth 200 points each. Since it is outside of the line of development, the 10" Elm will not count toward your point calculation. 7. Water demands of the irrigation meter need to be included with this submittal (minimum, maximum, and average demands in gallons per minute). Also, please show the location of the meter. 8. On Sheet C -3, please note that irrigation will be approved prior to C.O. 9. The Fire Lane should have 8" red stripe painted on drive surface with 4" white letters stating "FIRE LANE NO PARKING TOW- AWAY- ZONE ". Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves /Molly Hitchcock Date: 03/30/01 ENGINEERING 1. Please present some information on how the drainage issue will be addressed. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: March 30, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 J: \PZTEXT\PZ04608. DOC STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PH2 (CUP)- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (1 -061) PLANNING THIS REVIEW WAS STOPPED. Because of inconsistencies between the plans submitted by Hester Eng. and SDT Architects, Inc., and because the CUP /Site Plan was submitted incomplete, Staff has conducted a cursory review of this project. A full site plan review will be conducted with next submittal. 1. Please submit a site plan checklist. 2. Sheets A1.0 and A0.1 of the building submittal from SDT Architects, Inc needs to be a part of the CUP /Site Plan submittal. Need to turn in 10 copies of A1.0 and A0.1. 3. Either on sheet A1.0 or C -1, please show the relationship of the site to the street/road it takes access from. 4. The proposed changes on sheet A1.0 needs to match the changes shown on C -1. 5. Please show name, address and telephone number of applicant/owner on this site plan. 6. On sheet A1.0, please draw a phase line 20' beyond any disturbed earth and calculate the area of proposed new development, as was done on L -1. This is only needed for the parking addition. Please include the size of this area on sheet A1.0 and C -1. 7. Please show current ownership and zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels on A1.0. 8. On A1.0, please identify the distance to the lot from the street. 9. To insure fire protection for the new addition, please show fire lanes and nearest fire hydrant. 10. You can have 300 points for the 8" Live Oak. You need to provide the scientific name for your elms. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves /Molly Hitchcock Date: 3/19/01 ELECTRICAL 1. No Comments Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky Date: 03/8/01 Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Rob Werley NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PH2 (CUP)- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (01 -061) PLANNING 1. Please show current zoning and ownership of adjacent properties. 2. If this property is not in the 100 -year flood plain, please make a note of this and reference the appropriate document. 3. Between Sheets C1 and A1.0, there is a discrepancy in the number of spaces in two rows of parking. 4. On sheet A1.0 you are claiming 63 new parking spaces, but you are only showing 57 new parking spaces on sheet A1.0 & C1. You are also showing on sheet A1.0 174 total parking spaces, but there are supposed to be 182. 5. On sheet C1, please remove the double lines in front of the proposed parking spaces. 6. The 6" Elms (Ulmus Crassifolia) protected are worth 200 points each. Since it is outside of the line of development, the 10" Elm will not count toward your point calculation. 7. Water demands of the irrigation meter need to be included with this submittal (minimum, maximum, and average demands in gallons per minute). Also, please show the location of the meter. 8. On Sheet C -3, please note that irrigation will be approved prior to C.O. 9. The Fire Lane should have 8" red stripe painted on drive surface with 4" white letters stating "FIRE LANE NO PARKING TOW- AWAY- ZONE ". Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves /Molly Hitchcock Date: 03/30/01 ENGINEERING 1. Please present some information on how the drainage issue will be addressed. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: March 30, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 J:\PZTEX DOC