Loading...
Miscellaneous09r`~7~'19"35 1~1:0~ ~09362~4~7 BUL~S~1'' t~INI*~ PAGE fl1 ~~ ~~..'. `~.'°hA45 lip ~;§ .r'~.c:i~':~+.Y?C~.1~~ C7~" `~.:a~:~E~:t~ ~ia!:l.i:i a: sta.C:'? %S'°x Cl: .? :7 ~'~~' ... ~~L~~'i ~',s%-7~~^e~ LK ~9 sd>;' ~L'.~~~.' ~... s:X so :7,^ri?7:: t33:`C~. ccyc i;~- ~!:-~X'i: ,~.' ~$ 'Y!. ~'s a 7, r'} d" tii?`Cti. 's3'~: :~. tis F."f, t.;x'~, iet .~. 4~ ~ c, tas a ^ ~' :i ~ 4 ; : ~=7'~': [=r ~S %°k:~~ s~ i,,k Lk'_-."-. Y w!°~'E: ~;7'~': ~s+:S .~. '4s' ~a'.~ ~:~ '~~. c".€ :.u' ~ _ °"t .;l t:! :S`.'- s :!"' i. ~ 5(1 'C. b:l ;+i. ~' .~..:f~.-.s.k'e]t.~.:ft.'~:~T :I. AZ :e;fx3',g''' 4~3~;'C" d ,nY~;.Z.1e ~. 'Ylwa:i;.~~ C:isa:a::: LkCfTt~la'~: ~°~;:.? ~'~::3C.f't'?.t: ~".f;5 ~:}~° .9.~'1~.-~:1;':~4~:s= ;~.'~, i'Fke~'~' ~;+h-~ s""t;k:[":~'.=•7.`'L'.g~C`I ~::~~} t'. /.~A7~.' r•~7-a1~:...:/:.t;,~4~5'L2 :,e :t:~'7-,.,w., kU'.~v?'~^S]'JC;kE~~°.:iS:7:i:..1.~.i.tit ~:'..:k ;f~e~~p' '~'.%z:r;:er:.n ?:"a;i'ftax:.4,%hrr ~„.'~'-{'A i.~'AE~ ~:.iCti7ti:~::st°:t"yJ'i:?:4:• i~l'~ i3~.. ~.~!.S'2.: ~ .'t Y'2 '~::.~$fi ~.~C_'r~~~ 3;' }'';Sd~;.&"'~ p~yy:: ~~ wW ypi a-F n~ ~;C~tt;~r,",7s'~4.'~ m'a ~!`~~~~f~!:t{ :~:iC':F7? ro ':kFMz~4,:r'S." ~i C-.a ~ ~.~"Sti.~:'`°> •~s,~ j M~„~~t~ 5•. =P•~.., >•`l ~ .'.t'°:',d:~~'~°:~i.7P~ f 4'`~ ~• t~.~€. l~~`."r',`.1'it~"°~`.`~:s.";I%ii;~ °-(,'~:~:~S~:C4~- ~7. S~:ti-~tt~s•r~~s..A~~1A-- ~:.C~..7na'N~~'«i.1~ y ! ~}~'q~,.y1 +~"y ~s.~~:;~~~3~:~ ~. ..? 5... ~F wA 3.3 ~e~9R'.'s 'rir t~d,'e~4 ~.,,.~d~.~ ,.~~'~,''4i F~~. (dam '3 'r$u~`.~a C~ ~~'~. 5~.~.~'.~q-x.p~s..~;:, d'~`'•~s.)7YS~'S"".~ S~';~$'ti,ub~ S'"'~',.S;4.ts a,3.S,~:?^y1` 16. ~ ~a ~j ~..~x ,~ r.~~t~~ F'xx~i~ ~3:,:i'1«~ :~i3iia'rA~ASi~' ~7' R A.. t. b E^d . .,.~ I. .3 ss A ~?: ,,. ~'k'.L '~'. `I S '.l:Te .tom ~'~ 51 '.4.5 i''I.. S.~ h. ~ t1 kw'~a'S." ~`~. ;"'?"s"a~f'L~,1~sE~~T~"3:' S'~fie'C`~1 '~n_~~ S:'1~+5~: S°°i~bT ~:: ~.t~~ri` ~t::k'~'. tst 3. L~.~X,}, fs'.' :E'~C7.Y` 7' .G a.."'. _=e C~:~"4_`~ a'}1 .~. :~ S.a 7' a :1~ ~''~t w. =:.~ .. _...ya ww..._._ ...............r.n .nwr.w. ..... uw. w. r~ew wru wn w+vrMrumem. rrt v,v.,a n. awn wmn ~- m .....-_._~._ -.-.......~...~.~..~......................... ~................_._.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~.. ~ . 8F~1~.x~~~? .3~a~tk~:.~ 1'~t^l.4i ~yy. St1 ~,~ S~"yy?„ 1.9~. CkXt ~ "r.Y 1L"E ~°.~e:l...A. ~..':.-a i :T~.~'.° n €n~ c:'F,' ~i:~:f,"s:~ v. 4~, ~:"A ~. ~ v'A rY ,': a l;?I a G.? ~~. ~~~ 0927/95 10>Q2 TX/RX N0.1346 F.001 . r IhAUNlCIPAL REVEL®PWIENT GROUP P.O. Box 9249 203 Holleman Drive East College Station, Texas 77840-9249 (409) 693-5359 ~_ ® ~ ~~ ~IS~~~~ OO ~ U ~WU~J~l11A.JO U ~WIS RAT[ q ® ~~~~ ,~/~7 °~i.! ~ ~dJ~ _ WE ARE SENDING YOU -Attached ^ Under separate cover via the .following items:. D Shop drawings ^ Prints O Plans. ~ Samples ^ Specifications • ^ Copy of letter ^ Change order ^ - COPIES DATE NO: DESCRIPTION ~ /Vlft~ j ~'f2 ~~~ ~' ~"~! 7® THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ^ Approved as submitted ^ Resubmit copies for approval. ^ For your use ^ Approved as noted ^ Submit copies for distribution- ^ As requested ^ Returned for. corrections p Return corrected prints ^ Far review and. comment ^ - ^FOR BIDS DUE 19 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS MINIMUM REpt)IRER'IENTS FOR FINAL PLATS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE LLOWING: INCLUDING BUT NOT L[MITED TO THE FO (Require-ner~ts based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers) L Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of l00' per inch. 2. Name & address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. ^ 3. Name & address of all lenders on the property. ^ 4. Name & address of all easement holders. ~S. Proposed name of subdivision (not spelled or pronounced similarly to any other subdivision in Brazos County, Texas). ~ 6. Date of preparation, scale in feet and north arrow. a. key map (vicinity map) not necessarily to scale. 7. Application fee. 8. Approved constriction documents on 24" x 36" sheets. ~" 9. Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and the C.S.LS.D. 10. Total area intended to be developed. ~'~ ~ ~ ^ 1 1. Subdivision boundary lines indicated by heavy lines. 12. jC:ertificate of Ownership R Dedication; ~--tificate of Surveyorship and/or Engineer; f~ertificate of City Engineer; ~pproval of Commission; /Approval of City Council; /Certificate of the County Clerk. (Owner(s)' signature(s) must be in place before taking plat to P&Z for consideration). 13. Number of lots. a. number of lots by Zoning District. ~-~ g b. average acreage of each residential lot by Zoning District. C~ c.,~~c=~+~~~~e ~ 14. Approximate area of street right-of--way. 1S. Proposed parkland dedication information. 16. Requested oversize participation items, if any. ,~ 17. Location of the One Hundred Yr. Floodplain according to the most recent available date. C~.-~~" 18. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of S00 feet per inch. 19. Exact location, dimensions, name and legal description of all existing or recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements or other R.O.W. within the subdivision, mtersecttng or contiguous with boundary or forming boundary with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves. 20. Same information for proposed streets, alleys, etc_ as preliminary plats. Q~ 2l. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and tied to basic survey data. ^ 22. Street, alley, and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections, with specifications and detail cost estimates. 23. Sanitary sewer plat with 2 foot contours, plan and profile lines, showing depth and grades, with cost estimates. 24. Water line plat showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with specifications and a detailed cost estimate. 25. Storm drainage system plat with 2 foot contours, street lines, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections, and showing drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, and 25 year rain intensity. Detail drainage structure design and channel lining design if used, with specification and detail cost estimate. 26. Street lighting plan showing location of lights, design, and with specifications and detail cost estimate. ^ 27. Submit a statement addressing any differences between the final plat and approved Master Preliminar}~ Plat & Plan. ^ 2~. Indicate any variances requested and reasons for same. ~..~/~C o~ CtA~. ~-S~C~, 30. Are there impact fees associated with this development? 31. Add a general note that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.004 of the Texas Water Code. r~mn~i~+r ioia~~;-v~ SEPTEMBER 2R. 1995 rdATALIE THOMAS - CITY OF COLLEGE STATION SUBJECT: PP~OJECT P,,EVIEt;f CO"^~MITTEE MEETING tdEDNESDAY, OCTOBER ~, 1995. GTE COMMENTS: FINAL PLAT - SHENANDOAH PHASE ONE; PROPOSED P~EPLAT OF' BLOCK B, A 1.2 ACRE RESERVE TRACT LOCATED Ord THE SOUTHtdEST CORNER OF STATE HIGHtdAY ~ AND SOUTHERN PLANTATION DRIVE, TO BE DIVIDED INTO Tt;'O C-N COMMEP~CIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TRACTS. ,95-23E! GTE COMMENTS: rd0 PROBLEM FINAL PLAT - ESTATE AT RIVER RUrd SUBDIVISION LOCATED THE INTERSECTIOrd OF RIDGE IN THE CITY'S DIVIDED INTO 57 RES TRACTS ;95-237) PHASE II; PROPOSED TO THE NORTH OF PHASE ONE AT PAI~vTT TRAIL AND THORUGHBRED E.T.J. TOTALING 258.Q3 ACRES IDErdTIAL LOTS ArdD TtvO RESERVE GTE COMMENTS: NO PROBLEM FIArdL PLAT - HARVEY HILLSIDES; PROPOSED RESUEDI.'ISIOrd OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3 OF THE HARVEY HILLSIDES SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY'S E.T.J. TOTALING 4.936 ACRES DIVIDED INTO 2 RESIDENTIAL LOTS. l95-238? GTE COMMENTS: NO PROBLEM THArdKS , ~~~ ~ LA VERVE AKINT GTE From: Mary Margaret Sexton To: SHOMEYER Date: 10/23/95 10:06am Subject: G. Taggart -Reply -Reply Yes, it does. I don't see it as a problem for the two easements to intersect as long as everyone (including A&M) knows what is happening and is in (written) agreement. »> Steve Homeyer 10/23/95 08:35am »> I was off Friday so here goes. Thursday night went fairly well. They said when they left that they would look into other options to see if they were feasible. We wanted them to provide us with something in writing so that in the future, if we annexed this area and took responsibility for the utilities in that easement, that A&M would not come back and tell us we had to remove them. Another scenario would be if in the process of A&M maintaining their line they damaged ours, then it would not be our responsibility to repair the damages. Does all of this make sense? »> Mary Margaret Sexton 10/20/95 10:59am »> So what happened last night with Taggart? Why did staff require him to get a letter. from A&M in the first place? Why are we concerned about enforcing A&M's property rights in their easement? From: Mary Margaret Sexton To: SHOMEYER, VMORGAN Date: 10/30/95 3:42pm Subject: River Run Estates I've done a substantial amount of research on the issue of coexisting easements, and I have come to the conclusion that there is no legal reason why an easement held by the City cannot coexist with an easement held by A&M, AS LONG AS use of the easement held by Taggart/ the City does not interfere with A&M's full use and enjoyment of their easement interest. If there is interference by the second easement-holder, then the first easement "wins." If A&M were to file suit against a second easement-holder claiming that the second easement unreasonably interferes with A&M's easement, and a judge or jury agrees, then an injunction could issue prohibiting that second easement-holder from maintaining its easement. That's a snapshot of the law on the issue. I think you just need to decide how much risk you are willing to assume with regard to our assuming ownership of the proposed easement and the likelihood of being able to peaceably coexist with A&M. MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP 203 Holleman Drive East • College Station, Texas 77840. 409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-693-4243 Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants ~y October 19, 1995 To: Brazos County Engineer and City of College Station PRC Re: Joint Usage of Existion TAMU Sewer Ei~luent Easement Through The Estates of River Run Phase II; Volume 1584, Page 340 Please find a copy of the easement attached to this response. If there is not language in an easement to specifically preclude usage by others, then others may use the easement; if the rights of the "grantee" are not adversely affected. This opinion was verified by Tom Giesenschlag, Title Attorney for Brazos County Abstract Company, on Thursday October 12, 1995. Also, the 100° x 100° compressor site easement recorded in Volume 1437, Page 45 to Ferguson Crossing Pipeline Company has been determined to be offsite. Southwest Gas Pipeline Company has acquired this easement and has identified it to be for Compressor Site #151059 at the intersection of Pipelines #151059 and 35098. This site is located to the east of Hopes Creek Road. Thank you, L We s resident 000600-c.05-10(2630) john-Q. Connally Bldg. • 301 Yarrow, 5th Floor • College Station, TX 77843-1120 • (409) 845-9612 • FAQ (409) 862-2713 ®ctober 26, 1995 Mr. Larry Wells President Municipal Development Group 203 Holleman Drive East College Station, Texas 77840 RE: .Texas A&M University Sanitary Sewer E$luent Easement as Filed for Record in Volume 1584, Page 340, and Notice of Existence of Unrecorded Letter of Understanding, Recorded in Volume 1614, Page 220, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas; Central File No. HIS .000-000-005 Dear Mr. Wells' I am in receipt of your letter dated October 24, 1'995, wherein you have .requested authorization to overlap other utility easements on the referenced outfall easement.. As I am sure you are aware, The Texas A&M University System does not have the authority to grant easements across thisparticular tract of land. The only entity that-can grant easements across this property is the owner of the land. However, you are on notice that-Texas A&M University will not enter into a joint use of this easement with any other entity and will not subordinate its position in the easement. I am sorry that we are not able to accommodate you. in this matter, but do wish you every success in the development of this property. , Sincerely,. an K.lBuchl Y Director DKB:gd HF# 000-000-005 cc: Mr. Tom Kale Dr. Jerry Gaston Eddie D. Gose, J.D. Universities Agencies : E'rairir Vick A~S~h1 Uni~~ersity Cexas ~A~L b1 university-Corpus Christi Cexas Agrirultuc~il Experitiient Stati~in Texas Engineering Extension Service Tarleton State Universflc testis ~A~rtii hniversity-Kingsville Texas Agricultural Eg[enSion Sen~ice Testis Forest Service Texa'SA~zM International L'nicersity West Cexas A&MUniversity Tex, Animal Damage Control~5ervice Teas Transportation institute Texas A&M Universit}' Texas EngineeringExperiment Station Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laburatoi}' MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Steve Homeyer, Graduate Civil Engineer ~~~~- DATE: October 19, 1995 RE: Final (ETA Plat Estates at River Run Phase II. (95-23~ The above referenced final plat was reviewed at a Presubmission Conference on Wednesday, October 4, 1995. The preliminary plat has been revised since it was approved by the Commission and Council in December of 1993. These revisions were made in order to reflect changes made by the Phase II final plat. This revised plat, due to its large size, is available for your review in Development Services. Staff would recommend approval of the final plat with the comments identified at the Presubmission Conference.