Loading...
05/05/2022 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX Meeting AgendaPlanning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840Internet: https://zoom.us/j/87262652291Phone: 888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 872 6265 2291 The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. May 5, 2022 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third-party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2.Hear Visitors. At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. An individual who wishes to address the Commission regarding any item on the agenda shall register with the Commission Secretary prior to 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number by calling 979.764.3751 or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to the Commission, email khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Commission. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 3.Informational 3.1.Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 3.2.Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: A Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club, Bar or Tavern Use encompassing 5,218 square feet on approximately 2.05 acres located at 3164 Holleman Drive South Suite 100. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on March 17, 2022 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval with the condition that there be a three-foot permitter barrier on the south side of the open-air bar. The City Council heard this item on April 14, 2022 and voted (7-0) to approve the request with the Commission's recommendation. A Rezoning from R Rural and GC General Commercial to MF Multi-Family on approximately 43 acres generally located at Holleman Drive South and General Parkway. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on March 17, 2022 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval of Exhibit #3. The City Council heard this item on April 14, 2022 and voted (7-0) to approve the request with the Commission's recommendation. Page 1 of 59 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 May 5, 2022 3.3.Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: Thursday, May 12, 2022 ~ Canceled ~ City Council Meeting Thursday, May 19, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. Thursday, May 26, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Christiansen) Thursday, June 2, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. 3.4.Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. None 4.Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments:1.April 21 2022 4.2.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Williams Creek Reserve Subdivision on approximately 56.952 acres, generally located on Rock Prairie Road east of Campbell Court. Case #FP2021-000030 Sponsors:Robin Macias Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3.Final Plat 5.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 6.Regular Agenda 6.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,“ Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 8.91 acres located at 1898 Arnold Road, generally located at the intersection of Arnold Road and Farah Drive. Case #REZ2022-000004 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the May 26, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors:Robin Macias Attachments:1.Staff Report Page 2 of 59 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 May 5, 2022 2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3.Background Information 4.Applicant's Supporting Information5.Rezoning Map 6.Existing Future Land Use Map 7.Original PDD ordinance 8.Exhibit "B" 9.Concept Plan 6.2.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 5 acres located at 404 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally located at the corner of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #REZ2022-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the May 26, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors:Jesse Dimeolo Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3.Background Information4.Applicant's Supporting Information 5.Rezoning Map 6.Existing Future Land Use Exhibit7.Rezoning Exhibit 8.Original PDD Ordinance 9.Concept Plan - Proposed 7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8.Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on April 29, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification Page 3 of 59 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 May 5, 2022 at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun."Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 of 59 April 21, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 21, 2022 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 838 6180 1247 Internet: https://zoom.us/j/83861801247 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, Jason Cornelius, and Melissa McIlhaney COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Mark Smith and Thomas Jackson COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Elizabeth Cunha CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Erika Bridges, Anthony Armstrong, Lucas Harper, Leslie Whitten, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Chairperson Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Informational Agenda 3.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 3.2 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, April 28, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison – Mirza) • Thursday, May 5, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, May 12, 2022 ~ Canceled ~ City Council Meeting • Thursday, May 19, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, May 26, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison – Christiansen) There was no discussion. 3.3 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. There was no discussion Page 5 of 59 April 21, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • April 7, 2022 4.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 201 on approximately 15.8 acres, generally located east of State Highway 6 South and north of Peach Creek Cut-Off Road in the City’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case #FP2020- 000034 4.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Midtown Reserve Phase 106 on approximately 8.667 acres, generally located south of Double Mountain Road near its intersection with Lady Bird Lane. Case #FP2020-000025 Commissioner Cornelius motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Wright seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed. 6. Regular Agenda There were no regular agenda items. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski introduced Planning & Development Services staff member, Lucas Harper, to the Commission. 8. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 6:03 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 6 of 59 Planning & Zoning Commission May 5, 2022 Supporting Materials 1.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2.Final Plat Scale 22 single family lots, 4 common areas on approximately 56.952 acres. Location Generally located off of Rock Prairie Rd east of Campbell Ct Property Owner Williams Creek Reserve LLC Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC Project Manager Robin Macias, Staff Planner, rmacias@cstx.gov Project Overview This final plat creates 22 new single family home lots. Additionally, there are 4 common areas. Preliminary Plan Approved November 4, 2021 Public Infrastructure Approximate Totals(Linear Feet): 2,325 Streets 0 Sanitary Sewer Lines 2,728 Water Lines 0 Sidewalks 3,615 Storm Sewer Lines Parkland Dedication $1,261 per lot Traffic Impact Analysis Not applicable Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes , with the exception of a waiver to block length previously approved in November 2021 with the preliminary plan. Staff Recommendation Approval Final Plat for Williams Creek Reserve FP2021-000030 Page 7 of 59 Page 8 of 59 Page 9 of 59 Page 10 of 59 WILLIAMS CREEK SUBDIVISION PHASE 6 WILLIAMS CREEK SUBDIVISION PHASE 7 WILLIAMS CREEK SUBDIVISION PHASE 7 LOT 1 1.033 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 2 1.043 AC. LOT 3 1.332 AC. LOT 4 1.321 AC. LOT 5 1.141 AC. LOT 6 1.158 AC. LOT 7 1.262 AC. LOT 8 1.126 AC. LOT 9 1.118 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 10 1.073 AC. LOT 11 1.107 AC.LOT 12 1.087 AC. LOT 13 1.200 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 14 1.693 AC. LOT 15 1.662 AC.LOT 16 1.140 AC.LOT 17 1.145 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 18 1.145 AC. LOT 19 1.145 AC. LOT 20 1.139 AC. LOT 21 1.158 AC. LOT 22 1.034 AC. BLOCK 1 COMMONAREA AAND PrDE1.134 A.C. COMMON AREA B10.263 A.C. COMMON AREA C13.285 A.C. WILLI A M M I L L S C O U R T WILLIAM MILLS COURTWILLIAM MILLS COURT KNOXVILLE WAY COMMON AREA D0.045 AC COMMON AREA E0.049 AC.ROCK PRAIRIE ROADCOMMON AREA F 0.022 AC. FF = 242' FF = 240' FF = 234' FF = 234' FF = 241' FF = 241' FF = 238' FF = 233' FF = 232' FF = 228'FF = 227' FF = 223'FF = 219'FF = 216'FF = 214' FF = 213' FF = 220' FF = 217'FF = 224'FF = 228' FF = 242' FF = 240' TBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: FINAL PLAT WILLIAMS CREEK RESERVE SUBDIVISION 56.952 ACRES SAMUEL W. ROBERTSON LEAGUE SURVEY, A-202 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS 22 LOTS BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-22 COMMON AREAS A, B, C & D SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SCALE 1'' = 100'NOVEMBER, 2021 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Williams Creek Reserve, LLC P.O. Box 800 Coleman, TX 76834 (979) 229-0310 LEGEND LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ROCK PRAIRIE RDWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYLICK CREEK PARK WILLIAMS CREEK CAMPBELL CTCITY O F C O L L E G E S T A T I O N C I T Y L I M I T S CITY OF COLLEGE STATIONCITY LIMITSPOINT OF BEGINNING CENTERLINE OFROCK PRAIRIE ROAD ROW DEDICATION1.90 ACRES SHEET 1 OF 3 Page 11 of 59 LOT 1 1.033 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 2 1.043 AC. LOT 3 1.332 AC. LOT 4 1.321 AC. LOT 5 1.141 AC. LOT 6 1.158 AC. LOT 7 1.262 AC. LOT 8 1.126 AC. LOT 9 1.118 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 13 1.200 AC. BLOCK 1 COMMON AREA B10.263 A.C.MILLS COURTWILLIAM M I L L S C O U R T KNOXVILLE WAY COMMON AREA D 0.045 AC FF = 242' FF = 240' FF = 234' FF = 234' FF = 241' FF = 241' FF = 238' FF = 242' FF = 240' LOT 18 1.145 AC. LOT 19 1.145 AC.LOT 20 1.139 AC. LOT 21 1.158 AC. COMMON AREA AAND PrDE1.134 A.C. WILLIAM MILLS COURT FF = 233' FF = 232' FF = 228' FF = 227' FF = 223' FF = 224'FF = 228' 1.033 AC. LOT 22 1.034 AC. BLOCK 1 KNOXVILLE WAY COMMON AREA D 0.045 AC COMMON AREA E 0.049 AC.ROCK PRAIRIE ROADCOMMON AREA F 0.022 AC. FF = 238' TBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SCALE 1'' = 60'NOVEMBER, 2021 LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ROCK PRAIRIE RDWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYLICK CREEK PARK WILLIAMS CREEK CAMPBELL CTCITY O F C O L L E G E S T A T I O N C I T Y L I M I T S CITY OF COLLEGE STATIONCITY LIMITSSHEET 2 OF 3 INSET A 1"=60' OWNER/DEVELOPER: Williams Creek Reserve, LLC P.O. Box 800 Coleman, TX 76834 (979) 229-0310 FINAL PLAT WILLIAMS CREEK RESERVE SUBDIVISION 56.952 ACRES SAMUEL W. ROBERTSON LEAGUE SURVEY, A-202 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS 22 LOTS BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-22 COMMON AREAS A, B, C, D, E & F INSET B 1"=60' LEGEND INSET C 1"=50' Page 12 of 59 TBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SCALE 1'' = 50'NOVEMBER, 2021 LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ROCK PRAIRIE RDWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYLICK CREEK PARK WILLIAMS CREEK CAMPBELL CTCITY O F C O L L E G E S T A T I O N C I T Y L I M I T S CITY OF COLLEGE STATIONCITY LIMITSSHEET 3 OF 3 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Williams Creek Reserve, LLC P.O. Box 800 Coleman, TX 76834 (979) 229-0310 FINAL PLAT WILLIAMS CREEK RESERVE SUBDIVISION 56.952 ACRES SAMUEL W. ROBERTSON LEAGUE SURVEY, A-202 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS 22 LOTS BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-22 COMMON AREAS A, B, C & D METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF A 56.952 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE SAMUEL W. ROBERTSON LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 202, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 648.21 ACRE TRACTOF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO WILLIAMS CREEK RESERVE, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME16453, PAGE 124 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS (O.P.R.B.C.T.). SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING IN THE CENTERLINE OF ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD (Y:10194665.16, X:3592827.71) AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER OF 648.21 ACRE TRACT; COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN ARE NAD83 (TEXAS STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH) BASED ON THE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CONTROL MONUMENT CS94-257 (Y:10194481.85, X:3593170.56) AND AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION; DISTANCES SHOWN HEREIN ARE GRID DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AREAS SHOWN AS“MEASURED” ARE CALCULATED FROM GRID DISTANCES, TO DETERMINE SURFACE DISTANCES,NOT SURFACE AREAS, MULTIPLY BY A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00009641738449[CALCULATED USING GEOID12B]; THENCE: N 07° 24' 08” E, PASS A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED 'C.E.C. 2003' FOUND ON THE FENCED NORTHEAST LINE OF ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD (R.O.W. WIDTH VARIES) AT 31.72 FEET, PASS A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE MOST EASTERLY SOUTH CORNER OF LOT 19, BLOCK 8, WILLIAMS CREEK SUBDIVISION PHASE 7 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 7964, PAGE 180 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS AT 42.71 FEET, FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 1,405.02 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED 'SM KLING RPLS 2003' FOUND MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 10 AND 14 OF SAID BLOCK 8; THENCE: N 33° 17' 47” E, PASS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE SOUTHEASTCORNER OF LOT 36, BLOCK 7, WILLIAMS CREEK SUBDIVISION PHASE 6 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11426, PAGE 67 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, PASS A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED 'C.E.C. 2003' FOUND ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 36 AT 638.17 FEET, FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 692.21 FEET TO THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF CARTERS CREEK; THENCE: ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF CARTERS CREEK FOR THE FOLLOWINGCALLS: S 80° 06' 47” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.17 FEET; N 87° 09' 38” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 112.38 FEET; N 49° 51' 40” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 54.54 FEET; N 21° 51' 45” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.18 FEET; N 55° 22' 04” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 98.52 FEET; S 40° 54' 28” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 104.92 FEET; S 33° 33' 18” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 103.51 FEET; S 45° 13' 35” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 82.24 FEET; S 49° 16' 43” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 71.93 FEET; S 53° 06' 38” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.94 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 25.93 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AS TRACT ONE IN A DEED TO GAVIN MCINTYRE AND LISA MCINTYRE RECORDED IN VOLUME 9282, PAGE 76 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLICRECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE: S 03° 00' 52” E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID 25.93 ACRE TRACT, PASS A 1/2 INCHIRON ROD FOUND AT 28.24 FEET, FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 733.65 FEET (DEED CALL: S 00° 52' 31”E - 756.51 FEET, 9282/76, O.P.R.B.C.T.) TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED 'C.E.C. 2003'FOUND MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 25.93 ACRE TRACT; THENCE: N 87° 03' 52” E ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 25.93 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 149.67 FEET (DEED CALL: N 89° 07' 29” E - 150.00 FEET, 9282/76, O.P.R.B.C.T.) TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED 'SM KLING RPLS 2003' FOUND MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 1.98 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AS TRACT TWO IN SAID DEED, 9282/76 (O.P.R.B.C.T.); THENCE: S 02° 58' 57” E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID 1.98 ACRE TRACT, PASS A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED 'KERR 4502' SET ON THE NORTH LINE OF ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD AT 1,433.48 FEET, FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 1,468.25 FEET (DEED CALL: S 00° 52' 31” E - 1,432.10 FEET, 9282/76, O.P.R.B.C.T.) TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD; THENCE: ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: N 88° 39' 41” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 212.60 FEET; N 87° 37' 52” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 396.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 994.23 FEET; ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 21' 46” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF231.88 FEET, CHORD BEARS: N 80° 56' 59” W A DISTANCE OF 231.35 FEET, TO THE END POINT OF SAID CURVE; N 74° 16' 07” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 148.23 FEET; N 69° 28' 35” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 180.45 FEET; N 66° 52' 08” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 172.23 FEET; N 62° 52' 23” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 94.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING56.952 ACRES OF LAND AS MEASURED BY GRID DISTANCES, MORE OR LESS, AS SURVEYEDON THE GROUND NOVEMBER 2020. Page 13 of 59 May 5, 2022 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Arnold Road PDD To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Robin Macias, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A , “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 8.91 acres located at 1898 Arnold Road, generally located Arnold Road and Farah Drive. Case # REZ2022-000004 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the May 26, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the modified rezoning request and concept plan. Summary: This request is to modify the existing PDD Planned Development District Zoning and concept plan on approximately 8.91 acres. The property was originally zoned PDD Planned Development District with the neighboring property to the east in 2012. The commercial portion of the original PDD has since developed, so this PDD modification request covers the undeveloped residential portion of the property. The applicant is requesting to change the base zoning from R-6 High Density Multi-Family to MF Multi- Family and update the general layout of the Concept Plan with modifications to the maximum height, parking space requirement, and cross access as set forth in the Concept Plan. These modifications will not change the land uses currently allowed on the property, but are to provide benefits to the senior community. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject property as Medical. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Medical land use designation as follows: Medical – Areas appropriate for medically related uses and supporting office, commercial, and residential uses. The medical land use designation surrounding Rock Prairie and State Highway 6 is further detailed in the Medial District Master Plan, which envisions a wide array of medical and supporting services and activities concentrated in the district. The subject property is part of the College Station Medical District Master Plan that was approved in October 2012. The Medical District Master Plan includes areas appropriate for medically related uses, including the region’s two major hospitals, and supporting office, commercial, and residential uses. Uses allowed through the current PDD, and that are not proposed to be changed, include: senior-targeted independent living, assisted living, active adult communities, senior-targeted Page 14 of 59 mixed income multi-family developments, nursing homes, convalescent homes, extended care facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and memory care facilities. As the intent is to develop a facility targeted at senior living, the uses allowed by the existing PDD are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Medical District Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The property has frontage to Arnold Road. Adjacent properties are zoned PDD Planned Development District to the east and R Rural and GS General Suburban to the south. There is a city park to the north of the subject property. Adjacent and nearby properties are developed as a city park, residential homes, and an assisted living facility. The PDD’s land uses are appropriate in the context of the area. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for multi-family development. The site has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for the base zoning district of MF Multi-Family as set forth in the PDD. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development. Detention is required as part of the development and the outfall capacity is provided by the storm system under Arnold Road. The subject property has frontage to Arnold Road, a minor collector on the Throughfare Plan, and will have driveway access to it. A traffic impact analysis was not required for the proposed request as the anticipated traffic volume falls below the threshold of 150 trips in the peak hour that would require a TIA to be performed. 5. The marketability of the property: The proposed modifications to the existing PDD and Concept Plan will increase the marketability of the property by eliminating the need for stairs and providing closer parking for the senior community living in the dwellings. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building areas as well as other site related features. The proposed Concept Plan is generally changing the building and parking layout from the original PDD Concept Plan. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1.The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; Page 15 of 59 2.The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3.The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4.Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5.The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6.The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7.The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Purpose, Intent and Community Benefits: The proposed PDD for this property outlines the purpose, intent, and community benefit of the proposed development, which is to provide senior-targeted facilities and continuum of care facilities that are located within walking distances to existing premier medical service providers and major retailers. The applicant has proposed a multi-family townhome-like project that is limited in height with parking near the homes targeted for senior living. Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications: The proposed PDD will have a base zoning of MF Multi-Family. This is not a change in the current land use from the previously approved PDD in 2012. The base zoning district shall be changed from R-6 High Density Multi-Family to MF Multi-Family due to the R-6 High Density Multi-Family zoning district being retired. At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and platting requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance for the base zoning district, except where meritorious modifications are granted with the PDD zoning. The applicant is requesting the following modifications to the notes on the existing Concept Plan: Section 12-7.3 Off-Street Parking Standards: Multi-Family o 1 bedroom unit: reduced from 1.5 spaces per bedroom to 1.15 spaces per bedroom (no change from original PDD) o 2 + bedroom units: now proposed to meet the parking space requirements as set forth in Section 12-7.3 of the UDO Section 12-5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards: Reduction in the maximum height to 40 feet. The previous Concept Plan stated that the maximum building height would be 50 feet for lot one and 60 feet for lot two. Page 16 of 59 Section 12 – 7.4 Access Management and Circulation Cross access shall not be required to adjacent development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated Concept Plan. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Background Information 3. Applicants Supporting Information 4. Rezoning Map 5. Existing Future Land Use Map 6. Original Zoning Ordinance 7. Exhibit “B” 8. Concept Plan Page 17 of 59 Page 18 of 59 Page 19 of 59 Page 20 of 59 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022 Advertised Council Hearing Date: May 26, 2022 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: 15 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition:None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts:None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Parks & Greenways GS General Suburban City Park South Suburban Residential and Institutional/Public GS General Suburban and R Rural Single family homes and City of College Station utilities East Medical PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of GC General Commercial Assisted living facility West Parks & Greenways GS General Suburban City Park DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexed: December 1993 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (1993) R-1 Single Family Residential (2002) PDD Planned Development District (2012) Final Plat:College Station Medical & Senior Living Lots 1 & 2 Site Development:Undeveloped Page 21 of 59 Name of Project:ARNOLD ROAD PDD Address:1898 ARNOLD DR Legal Description:COLLEGE STATION MEDICAL + SENIOR LIVING, LOT 2 Total Acreage:8.91 Applicant:: Property Owner:TEXAS HOTEL MANAGEMENT CORP Kimley-Horn (Bryan) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. ‡The application is for an amendment of the concept plan and certain elements of the PDD. The primary zoning and uses will not be changed. Market conditions in the area make this amendment necessary. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The proposed zoning is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The current zoning allows senior targeted residential used (i.e. senior targeted independent living, assisted living, and active-adult communities, nursing homes, memory care facilities, etc.). The market shows there is a need in our community for senior independent living facilities which will allow for residents 55+ who are not looking for an assisted living facility to live in a community of their peers. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The amendment will not change the permitted used allowed in the PDD. The proposed zoning allows senior targeted residential used (i.e. senior targeted independent living, assisted living, and active-adult communities, nursing homes, memory care facilities, etc.). The market shows there is a need in our community for senior independent living facilities which will allow for residents 55+ who are not looking for an assisted living facility to live in a community of their peers. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 22 of 59 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The amendment will not change the permitted used allowed in the PDD. The proposed zoning allows senior targeted residential used (i.e. senior targeted independent living, assisted living, and active-adult communities, nursing homes, memory care facilities, etc.). The market shows there is a need in our community for senior independent living facilities which will allow for residents 55+ who are not looking for an assisted living facility to live in a community of their peers. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The current concept plan shows large multi-story multi-family buildings for the seniors. This is not ideal for senior residents due to the ease of climbing stairs and parking a distance away from the entrance. List any other reasons to support this zone change. The revised concept plan allows for single-story attached senior living homes that will allow each resident to park at their front door. Page 2 of 2 Page 23 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. Z012--33AZ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP," OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", and as shown graphically in Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" and Exhibit "E", attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 12m day of January, 2012 APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: City Secr ry APPROVED: 4 City Attorney Page 26 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2&12 - 331-42 Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" That Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from R-1 Single-Family Residential to PDD Planned Development District: Page 27 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2e) I2 - 33q 2,Page 3 7 Texas Hotel Management Corporation 17.07 Acre Tract Robert Stevenson Survey, A-54 College Station, Brazos County, Texas otes of a 17.07 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated inrRbtevensonSurvey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, eing part of the called 17.215 acre tract described in the deed from to Texas Hotel Management Corporation recorded in Vo lume 3665, the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and said 17.07 acre ore particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a %2" iron rod found marking a 3-way comer between the beforementioned 17.215 acre tract and the 18.83 acre tract described in the deed to the City of College Station, Texas, recorded in Volume 448, Page 234, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and Lot 2R, Block 3 - 0.59 acre, according to the Amending plat of Belmont Place, Section Two, recorded in Volume 7543, Page 285, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, same being the north corner of the said 17.215 acre tract; THENCE S 480 01' 03" E along the common line between the beforementioned 17.215 acre tract and Block 3, Belmont Place, Section Two, at a distance of 349.11 feet pass a Y:" iron rod and cap found marking the southeast terminus of Normand Drive - 60' wide right-of-way, continue on for a total distance of 530.42 feet to a %2" iron rod and cap found marking the common corner between the said 17.215 acre tract and the 35.00 acre tract described in the deed to the City of College Station, Texas, recorded in Volume 692, Page 506, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, same being in the southwest line of Lot 1 R, Block 3 - 23.83 acres, Amending Plat of Belmont Place, Section Two; THENCE S 420 58' 19" W along the common line between the beforementioned 17.215 acre tract and the following two tracts: the beforementioned 35.00 acre tract, and a 30.02 acre - remainder tract, described in the deed to F. M. Arnold, recorded in Volume 200, Page 445, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, adjacent to a chain link and barbed wire fence, at a distance of 857.04 feet, a'/2" iron rod found marking the common corner between the said 35.00 acre tract and the 30.02 acre - remainder tract, bears southeast -0.65 feet and a chain link fence corner bears southeast - 3.1 feet, continue on, for a total distance of 1048.54 feet to a iron rod found; THENCE along the common line between the beforementioned 17.215 acre tract and the 30.02 acre - remainder tract and around an abandoned water well, as follows: S 421 42'01 " E for a distance of 36.83 feet to a %2" iron rod and cap found, S 43° 25' 12" W for a distance of 10.56 feet to a '/2' iron rod and cap found, N 430 10'46" W for a distance of 36.92 feet to a W' iron rod found, from which a 6" creosote post fence corner bears S 211 42' E - 5.5 feet; THENCE along the common line between the 17.215 acre tract and the Arnold Road (private road), as follows: S 42° 58' 48" W for a distance of 34.43 feet to a''/2" iron rod and cap found, S 650 14'02" W for a distance of 166.40 feet to a iron rod set at the east corner of a 0.156 acre tract described in the deed to Craig Browne and Rostell Chapman, according to the deed recorded in Volume 5027, Page 162, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and dedicated as Arnold Road, according to the plat of Carroll Addition, recorded in Volume 5229, Page 47, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas; KLING ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING BAYAN,TE%AS Page 28 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. ZO 12 - 33ci Z Page 4 Texas Hotel Management Corporation 17.07 Acre Tract Robert Stevenson Survey, A-54 College Station, Brazos County, Texas Continued - Page 2 THENCE along the northeast and northwest right-of-way lines of Arnold Road, as follows: N 470 32'32" W for a distance of 32.38 feet to a iron rod set, S 630 10'46" W for a distance of 180.26 feet to a '/2" iron rod and cap set at the beginning of a curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 405.00 feet. Southwesterly along said curve, for an arc distance of 124.58 feet to a %s" iron rod and cap found in the northeast line of a 9.93 acre tract, described in the deed to the City of College Station, Texas, recorded in Volume 448, Page 230, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, the chord bears S 54° 22' 03" W - 124.09 feet, the east corner of the said 9.93 acre tract bears S 47132' 40" E 1.17 feet; THENCE N 47° 32' 40" W along the common line between the beforementioned 17.215 acre tract and the 9.93 acre tract, for a distance of 316.81 feet to a iron rod found marking the common corner between the said 17.215 acre tract and the beforementioned 18.83 acre tract; THENCE N 410 48' 29" E along the common line between the beforementioned 17.215 acre tract and the beforementioned 18.83 acre tract, for a distance of 1532.94 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 17.07 acres of land, more or less. tiP'{»•w.; ~C,Surveyed: November, 2011 s=v.,S. M. Kling ia ti,~,f11 R.P.L.S. No. 2003 Prepared 11/29111 kesl 1-WITezds Hotel Management i / 072c. wPd Page 29 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. ZC I Z - 33q 2 Page 5 EXHIBIT "B" Purpose & Intent The purpose of the PDD zoning district is to provide senior-targeted residential facilities, continuum of care, and medical facilities that are located within walking distance to existing, premier medical service providers and major retailers. Permitted Uses The following uses will be permitted in the residential areas: Senior-Targeted Independent Living, Assisted Living, and Active-Adult communities; Senior-Targeted Mixed-Income Multifamily Developments; Nursing Homes; Convalescent Homes; Extended Care Facilities; Skilled Nursing Facilities; and Memory Care Facilities. The following uses will be permitted in the non-residential use area: Hospital; Offices; Medical Retail; Medical Clinics; Skilled Nursing; and Memory Care Facilities. Stand-alone retail and restaurant uses shall not be permitted unless they serve as an accessory use to another primary use. Definitions Senior: Adults 55 years of age or older. Senior-Targeted Community: A community that provides features, amenities, operational standards, services and use restrictions that adults 55 years of age or older find desirable. By choosing to provide senior-targeted amenities, and consciously not provide amenities desired by the general public of ages less than 55, seniors often self-select into these communities. Many senior-targeted communities are often age-restricted as well, to reinforce and bolster the sense of safety and community desired by senior residents. Senior-targeted communities feature amenities consciously planned into the development; among these particular amenities, open space within half a block and recreational facilities are the most common. These recreational facilities include walking trails and park spaces, along with a lifestyle center/ clubhouse that emphasize clubs and activities and feature resort-style amenities. Amenities often include an indoor and/or outdoor heated swimming pool, whirlpool tub, steam and/or sauna rooms, separate facilities for aerobics and weight training, rooms for cards, games and billiards, and often feature a great room with a commercial kitchen as well as Page 30 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 20 12 - 33q 2 Page 6 facilities for tennis, golf, shuffleboard, bocce, and more. Clubs and activities focus on scrapbooking and other crafts. Active-Adult Communities: Active adult housing refers to communities either age-targeted or age-restricted to people aged 55 or older. Active adult housing is often designed for complete single-floor living, with features like laundry facilities and the master bedroom and bathroom on the first floor. The properties have few, if any, steps to get into the home, and often boast details like toggle/rocker light switches, lever handles, shower stalls with seats, wide doorways, and other features that make life easier for people who are experiencing the pains associated with aging (like arthritis). Active adult communities feature amenities consciously planned into the development; among these particular amenities, open space within half a block and recreational facilities are the most common. These recreational facilities include walking trails and park spaces, along with a lifestyle center/ clubhouse that emphasize clubs and activities and feature resort-style amenities. Amenities often include an indoor and/or outdoor heated swimming pool, whirlpool tub, steam and/or sauna rooms, separate facilities for aerobics and weight training, rooms for cards, games and billiards, and often feature a great room with a commercial kitchen as well as facilities for tennis, golf, shuffleboard, bocce, and more. Clubs and activities focus on scrapbooking and other crafts. Building Height The center portion of the site (see Concept Plan - Exhibit "C") will consist of residential uses with maximum height of four stories and 60 feet. The western portion will also consist of residential uses with a maximum height of three stories and 50 feet. Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications in accordance with the above Purpose & Intent statement, the Concept Plan (Exhibit "C") proposes residential and non-residential use areas. The residential use areas will adhere to the dimensional standards and requirements of the R-6 High Density Multi-Family district while the non-residential use area will follow the C-1 General Commercial district standards. At the time of plat and site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and platting requirements of the UDO for the C-1 General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-Family zoning classifications, except for the parking reduction and block length/block perimeter/access way meritorious modifications that are described in Concept Plan Note 5 as provided in Exhibit "D." Parkland Dedication Credit for Construction of Multi-Use Path: Construction of a portion of the multi-use path identified on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan that connects Arnold Road to Rio Grande Boulevard through the Southwood Community Park. Specifically, construct the portion of the multi-use path shown on the Concept Plan adjacent to the development on the City's park property. Construction of the multi-use path can be counted as credit toward the Community Park Development fee-in-lieu funds that is required for the residential units constructed with this development. Page 31 of 59 ORDINANCE NO.- Z.0) ' Z - 3?> 92 Page 7 EXHIBIT" C" e Ro HMJ~ O r Z Ua l i Dtic a PR. PGSEC N. GRV4Np DRIVE o 1 O / 3 ~ ~ d Q I Q I L k. o I i Ix, Tilt- a P: 3 sr. R I PZ2 S=' DI j 4 syydkTdT, Sys y U SARAH DRI' JE a ~ a~~ o~~ I 11 111 q¢ e5 Page 32 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2012, 3,;,)q 2 Page 8 EXHIBIT"D" Z N a x N Lwu C/) a 1 1 1 ~ Z Z ~ W pa~OtaWU ~a Z Q ZSd W> OZm W ~vV... W O n O° z oomwaw U z W Uma Ana E Z a W" a O o w U Z= o _om Y x ti Q O ll~ m z zz na V 3 z3wE0xmaww m lu aw -o w Ln cnzNw N 3 Z N 5 g z a x z o? oUW Z U Z a a U O- in z w ~O N O J 3> z m~z m Z O n Vl W W O NZ- N } Y O Z n W N N° F U Go`~a pO z o o E n3 n a v ow o w o J W a any p U z ¢z V V z ~ G NO w O Q ink vi n aaZrn N ¢W W aw m m a o x z= In z w a m 2 g= oa Y c 0~Z O Q p O c 0p O G z p O nzvom05000p2W> o p Y zZl0NO° LJ W U w0 z m p aw z° 3 in m3 o m°z 3 ow C)oz w° 3w w o No z0WoWo0¢ N z O N O d O N U N 1/ 1 N N f N j V N O K V C p F OU 2 Z L- 00 00 m m U~ N Z O~ p ~Ozpo - m n M n u\i aw °w x p po z¢ J O Q°O N Om 3 m mw opV°Oz E O wxpzmfC) U U Q 3 W N Y Q V Z~ n r w m O Q O W N N N N Q N Z¢ Z m n Q m Z N Z GNOOOOIx ¢ O NO O O N v1 V m V x N U3 OUd Z 0 0 V OUN z z O O~ o z z JiNO Z~ ~~W O~ N a ZO wN¢W H Lv W L7 z U N W m Z Z f a j °°a L-m wz xz°o o cv viW a n a Apo ¢o a a o U J N OU O m U z0 N z' j z v m z m VI zz~3 z N N I-w c5 Q Ora ~F- J Z p~ Z tt 3 N N ¢ w z aw o3 m3z 3 o a~ wzzr ti ° N o v °x ttN zl-¢ oa cxn o- o°QoozZ o w w wW~ °Q m 3 aFwUVW5-; N w Apo z 3a inwo p° m mw ¢ozOjNWzpZ~~I 3 w a a z O Z aOVUUZ z::,zz~Z mW o ao oN 3W x s a 44 W C) Y m z mxf , m a w 3 z m z p U o Q< m m m z w z 3 ° o m¢ zwnUwZPJO3pz ° 4 K N N I u Q N m Z O n z M6.ng°z V z opa w o dmuo o° a a3 o w= oo m N o p U U I p N Z O w n OtiOUNN KVZ U¢ _N O U¢N a Page 33 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2012 - 3:-:~9 a,Page 9 EXHIBIT"E" Z y0 4.z D t t o 2 QN 2 p v~omW Ld r+~o d~~y .z z i. p L -yb o UtmmO gdGr~°^d d0 cu az1va>>m r. M O ~aU' C9 c9>O Z Z Z O WpY 00 u v rnV js~LJ rttf r~o o U N oo" I LLi i v>~u9 I V-76.c0~E L ~ ~ C C Qmrnv0sUxu~a 20 ~Z Q I LL) J Q E E E Ux r. o,gip)i.. a LL~ u ul r I I I I I I I W K K Q U U Cc w0 N aL22.aoQ w n m m 32 r er do,o v E bs oo~Q'O p utr ~w d 1f1] d~p~0 n La~~y o Ali Q 80 nn d C k J n~ L~ilk ~gO C,m ZC 543010 LJ I I I Iciie Page 34 of 59 EXHIBIT “B” Purpose & Intent The purpose of the PDD zoning district is to provide senior-targeted residential facilities and continuum of care that are located within walking distance to existing, premier medical service providers and major retailers. Permitted Uses The following uses will be permitted: •Senior-Targeted Independent Living, Assisted Living, and Active-Adult communities; •Senior-Targeted Mixed-Income Multifamily Developments; •Nursing Homes; •Convalescent Homes; •Extended Care Facilities; •Skilled Nursing Facilities; and •Memory Care Facilities. Definitions •Senior: Adults 55 years of age or older. •Senior-Targeted Community: A community that provides features, amenities, operational standards, services and use restrictions that adults 55 years of age or older find desirable. By choosing to provide senior-targeted amenities, and consciously not provide amenities desired by the general public of ages less than 55, seniors often self-select into these communities. Many senior-targeted communities are often age-restricted as well, to reinforce and bolster the sense of safety and community desired by senior residents. Senior-targeted communities feature amenities consciously planned into the development; among these particular amenities, open space within half a block and recreational facilities are the most common. These recreational facilities include walking trails and park spaces, along with a lifestyle center/clubhouse that emphasize clubs and activities and feature resort-style amenities. Amenities often include an indoor and/or outdoor heated swimming pool, whirlpool tub, steam and/or sauna rooms, separate facilities for aerobics and weight training, rooms for cards, games and billiards, and often feature a great room with a commercial kitchen as well as facilities for tennis, golf, shuffleboard, bocce, and more. Clubs and activities focus on scrapbooking and other crafts Page 35 of 59 •Active-Adult Communities: Active adult housing refers to communities either age-targeted or age-restricted to people ages 55 or older. Active adult housing is often designed for complete single-floor living, with features like laundry facilities and the master bedroom and bathroom on the first floor. The properties have few, if any steps to get into the home, and often boast details like toggle/rocker light switches, lever handles, shower stalls with seats, wide doorways, and other features that make life easier for people who are experiencing the pains associated with aging (like arthritis). Active adult communities feature amenities consciously planned into the development; among these particular amenities, open space within half a block and recreational facilities are the most common. These recreational facilities include walking trails and park spaces, along with a lifestyle center/clubhouse that emphasize clubs and activities and feature resort-style amenities. Amenities often include an indoor and/or outdoor heated swimming pool, whirlpool tub, steam and/or sauna rooms, separate facilities for aerobics and weight training, rooms for cards, games and billiards, and often feature a great room with a commercial kitchen as well as facilities for tennis, golf, shuffleboard, bocce, and more. Clubs and activities focus on scrapbooking and other crafts. Building Height The residential portion of the site (see Concept Plan – Exhibit “C”) will consist of residential uses with a maximum height 40 feet and will not meet the requirements as set forth in Section 7.2.H "Low Density Residential Height Protection" to the adjacent park property. Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications In accordance with the above Purpose & Intent statement, the Concept Plan (Exhibit “C”) proposes a residential area. The residential use area will adhere to the dimensional standards and requirements of the MF Multi-Family district. At the time of plat and site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and platting requirements of the UDO for the MF Multi-Family zoning classification, except for the parking reduction and block length/block perimeter/access way meritorious modifications that are described in Concept Plan Note 5 as provided in Exhibit “D”. Parkland Dedication Credit for Construction of Multi-Use Path Construction of a portion of the multi-use path identified on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan that connects Arnold Road to Rio Grande Boulevard through Southwood Community Park. Specifically, construct the portion of the multi-use path shown on the Concept Plan adjacent to the development on the City’s park property from Arnold Road to Brian Bachmann Park Drive. Construction of the multi-use path can be counted as credit toward the Community Park Development fee-in-lieu funds that is required for the residential units constructed with this development. Page 36 of 59 DETENTION POND BUILDI N G WITHPARKIN G B U I L D I N G WI T H P A R K I N G BUILDINGWITHPARKINGBUILDINGWITHPARKING BUILDINGWITHPARKING BUILDINGWITHPARKING BUILDINGWITHPARKINGBUILDINGWITHPARKING BUILDINGWITHPARKING BUILDINGWITHPARKING BUILDINGWITHPARKING MF - MULTI-FAMILY40' MAX HEIGHT ARNOLD ROAD NORMAND DRIVEDETENTION POND PARKING PARKING BUILDING COURTYARD PARKING BUILDING PARKING GREENSPACE ANDTRAIL AREA 20' C I T Y O F B R Y A N EL E C T R I C A L E A S E M E N T 60' C I T Y O F B R Y A N EL E C T R I C A L E A S E M E N T 20.0'40.0'FARAH DRIVECARROLLADDITION UTILITY SERVICE CENTER BRIAN BACHMANN ATHLETIC PARK COMMUNITYCENTER SKATE PARK N/F OLIVE HANNA ARNOLD1.88 ACRESZONED R-RURAL N/FCOLBIE PROPERTIES LLC0.46 ACRESZONED R-RURAL N/FGARRETT & HANNAH KAISER0.24 ACRESZONED GS - GENERAL SUBURBAN N/FBRYCE PHILIP POHLMEIER0.24 ACRESZONED GS - GENERAL SUBURBAN ST. JOSEPHREGIONAL HEALTHCENTER22.18 ACRESZONED GC -GENERALCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SOCCERFIELD EX. DRI V E DEVELOPED SUBJECT PROPERTY ARNOLD RD.NORMAND DR.ROCK PRAIRIE R D .EARL RUDDER FREEWAY S.N O R T H VICINITY MAPVICINITY MAP N O R T H SITE LOCATION N.T.S. PROPERTY LINE LEGEND EXISTING EASEMENT 10' WIDE MULTI-USE PATH EXHIBIT "C"DWG NAMEK:\CST_CIVIL\064532506 - ARNOLD RD SENIOR LIVING\CAD\EXHIBITS\CONCEPT PLAN.DWGTHO. NR. 979 775-9595 BU\DQ, TH[DV 77802 2800 SRXWK TH[DV AYHQXH, SXLWH 201 FD[ NR. 979 775-9599 TBPE RHJLVWUDWLRQ NR. F-928 CONCEPT PLAN 8.91 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: PDD - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTPROPOSED ZONING:PDD - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COLLEGE STATION MEDICAL + SENIOR LIVING LOTS 1 AND 2 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS OWNER:TEXAS HOTEL MANAGEMENT CORP. 2121 WILLIAM J. BRYAN PARKWAY EAST #2864BRYAN, TEXAS 77850 SHEET 1 OF 2Page 37 of 59 EXHIBIT "D"DWG NAMEK:\CST_CIVIL\064532506 - ARNOLD RD SENIOR LIVING\CAD\EXHIBITS\CONCEPT PLAN.DWGTHO. NR. 979 775-9595 BU\DQ, TH[DV 77802 2800 SRXWK TH[DV AYHQXH, SXLWH 201 FD[ NR. 979 775-9599 TBPE RHJLVWUDWLRQ NR. F-928 CONCEPT PLAN NOTES8.91 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: PDD - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTPROPOSED ZONING:PDD - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COLLEGE STATION MEDICAL + SENIOR LIVING LOTS 1 AND 2 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS OWNER:TEXAS HOTEL MANAGEMENT CORP. 2121 WILLIAM J. BRYAN PARKWAY EAST #2864BRYAN, TEXAS 77850 SHEET 2 OF 2Page 38 of 59 May 5th, 2022 Regular Agenda PDD Rezoning – Valley Park Apartments To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 5 acres located at 404 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally located at the corner of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #REZ2022-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the May 26th, 2022, City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Summary: The property is the southernmost lot out of three lots that share driveway access off Harvey Mitchell Parkway. The two northern lots have been developed for commercial and office related uses, with this lower lot still undeveloped. The subject property is adjacent to the Aggie Field of Honor and was rezoned to a PDD to with a base zoning of MF Multi-Family in May 2017. This rezoning is not proposing any change to the base zoning of MF Multi-Family but is proposing an amended Concept Plan with a different bedroom per unit mix, a different building and amenity layout, and a meritorious modification for parking. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as General Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the General Commercial land use designation as follows: General Commercial – Concentrated areas of commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents and to the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be large and located along regionally significant roads. Due to their context, these areas tend to prioritize automobile mobility. The previous Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Character Map was amended from Suburban Commercial to Urban in May 2017 in conjunction with the adoption of the PDD rezoning that is existing on the property. With the property undeveloped at the time of the new Comprehensive Plan, the property was redesignated for General Commercial. The proposed zoning permits high-density multi-family development, which is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan but follows the character of the existing PDD zoning by proposing the same number of bedrooms with a different unit mix. Page 39 of 59 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The PDD zoning with a MF Multi-Family base district is appropriate in the context of the surrounding area because it provides a horizontal mixing of uses with the two properties to the north and gives easy access to residents. The proposed Concept Plan change to the unit mix and building layout does not negatively affect the surrounding area. The proximity to Texas A&M University provides a shorter commuting distance for residents or they can choose to use alternative modes of transportation and utilize the proposed multi-purpose trail. The lack of access to the site off Harvey Mitchell Parkway makes it more of a challenge to market the property as commercial. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: By creating a horizontal mix of uses, the proposed zoning helps spread out traffic throughout the day. If all three properties along the Harvey Mitchell Parkway frontage were commercial, traffic would be isolated to similar peak hours. The applicant also stated that the physical layout of the property and limited access to public rights-of-way made it difficult to market the property as commercial. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: Water service to the subject tract may be provided by an existing 10” water main along the front of the property. Domestic and fire flow demand may necessitate future water main extensions with site development. These utilities will be required to be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The site also has existing 6” sanitary sewer mains along the northern and western property lines and a lift station located near the northwestern corner. Wastewater for select properties, including this tract, are subject to an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Texas A&M University in which they have agreed to accept an enumerated sewer demand into their system. Based on preliminary demands provided, the ILA and lift station capacity appear to be adequate. The site will have access to Harvey Mitchell Parkway through an existing driveway and cross access easement on the adjacent site. No additional access points can be permitted due to the property’s proximity to the existing ramp on Harvey Mitchell Parkway. A TIA was not required, as the proposed land use classification change is expected to generate less than 150 vehicle trips during any peak hour period. 5. The marketability of the property: The property is actively being marketed for multi-family due to the proximity to Texas A&M University and the BioCorridor. Also being near to the Veterinary School and Health Science Center helps create a sub-market for one- and two-bedroom apartments. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Page 40 of 59 Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Purpose, Intent and Community Benefit: The purpose and intent of this PDD is to provide a multi-family housing product close to campus and the BioCorridor. Community Benefits are shown on the Concept Plan with increased landscape buffering along the shared property line with the Aggie Field of Honor Cemetery and a multi-use path. The Concept Plan retains the same buffer area between the property and the Aggie Field of Honor that was approved in the existing PDD. There is no change being made to the buffer area. Section 7.7 of the Unified Development Ordinance requires a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape buffer between the differing uses. Both the existing and proposed Concept Plan propose increasing this buffer to 25 feet. The required plantings in the buffer area will meet the standard requirements of Section 7.7. The existing chain-link fence along the property line will be replaced with a privacy fence. The intent of the increased buffer width is to address any concerns on the potential visual and audible degradation of the cemetery due to this development. The subject property will be accessed through the neighboring commercial properties to the north via a proposed access easement. The proposed multi-use pathway will connect Raymond Stotzer Parkway with existing commercial developments and the proposed multi-family development, allowing commercial properties and the proposed multi-family developments to access Texas A&M University by walking or biking. The pathway will supplement the single access available for vehicular transportation. Base Zoning District and Meritorious Modifications: The PDD Planned Development District zoning includes a MF Multi-Family base zoning district and all requirements associated with the base zoning district shall apply except where specifically modified herein. Page 41 of 59 The current rezoning request is for three modifications to the previously approved PDD Concept Plan—a modification to the number of units, a modification to the building layout on site, and a meritorious modification to the parking requirement. 1. Modification to the number of units The PDD currently states that the maximum building height will be four stories tall, with a maximum of 199 multi-family units and 339 bedrooms. One of the three proposed amendments to the Concept Plan is to change the number of units and the unit mix, but the total number of bedrooms will not change, just the ratio of bedrooms to units. Originally the ratio was 2.4 bedrooms per unit, but the proposed PDD will be 1.7 bedrooms per unit. 2. Building layout The second proposed amendment to the Concept Plan is related to the layout of development on the site. Concerns on the original PDD rezoning included noise from the pool amenity area next to the cemetery and apartment buildings blocking the view of Kyle Field from the cemetery. The applicant has addressed both concerns. Regarding noise coming from the pool amenity area, this will be located interior to the site and surrounded by the apartment building itself. The building will open towards Harvey Mitchell, not the cemetery. The second concern about sight angles to Kyle Field has been addressed by a clear zone easement established with the original plat in the southern portion of the property. This easement does not allow any structures to be built there. 3. Meritorious Modification – parking The third and last proposed amendment to the Concept Plan is a meritorious modification to the parking requirements for multifamily. UDO requirements for Multi-Family dwelling units are typically 1.5 spaces per bedroom for one-bedroom apartments and 1 space per bedroom for 2+ bedroom units. The proposal is for one parking space per bedroom regardless of the unit size with additional parking provided for staff. Floodplain & Detention: Stormwater from the site generally discharges to the northeast within the White Creek drainage basin. There is no FEMA regulated floodplain on site. The property has an existing detention pond at the southern corner, which will need to be evaluated with site development to confirm that the pond has adequate capacity to serve the entire site. Any necessary drainage improvements will need to be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines. Parkland: Fee-in-lieu of parkland dedication will be paid prior to building permits being issued based on the number of bedrooms. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map Page 42 of 59 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant’s Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Original PDD Ordinance 7. Concept Plan – Proposed 8. Existing Future Land Use Exhibit Page 43 of 59 Page 44 of 59 Page 45 of 59 Page 46 of 59 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022Advertised Council Hearing Date: May 26, 2022 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: N/A Property owner notices mailed: Three Contacts in support:None at the time of the staff report Contacts in opposition:None at the time of the staff report Inquiry contacts:None at the time of the staff report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North General Commercial CI Commercial Industrial and GC General Commercial Commercial Business and Office South (Across Raymond Stotzer)Texas A&M University C-U College University Easterwood Airport East (across Harvey Mitchell Pkwy) Texas A&M University C-U College University Texas A&M Property West Institutional/Public R Rural Cemetery DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1970 Zoning:R-1 upon annexation (1970) C-1 General Commercial to C-2 Commercial Industrial (2005) C-2 Commercial Industrial renamed CI Commercial Industrial (2012) PDD Planned Development District (2017) Final Plat:2011, Valley Park Center Site development: Vacant Page 47 of 59 Name of Project: REVISE THE CURRENT PD FROM 142 MULTIFAMILY UNITS TO 199 UNIT Address: 404 HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S Legal Description: VALLEY PARK CENTER, LOT 3R, ACRES 4.74 Total Acreage: 4.74 Applicant: BEAMON ENGINEERING, LLC Property Owner: BATES-FLATO HOLDINGS LP List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The developer has seen an increased market for one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments. Therefore the developer would like to change the current PD, which has a cap of 142 units with an average of 2.4 bedrooms per unit, to 199 units with an average of 1.7 bedrooms per unit. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The zoning request is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan without meritorious modifications but follows the character of the existing PD zoning by proposing the same number of bedrooms with a different unit mix. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The property is suitable for multifamily uses due to the proximity to Texas A&M University. The lack of access creates a challenge to market the property as commercial. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property is suitable for multifamily uses due to the proximity to Texas A&M university and Easterwood Airport. The lack of access creates a challenge to market the property as commercial. The proximity to the departments of A&M that enroll graduate students (Vet school and Health Science Center) create a sub- market for one and 2-bedroom apartments. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property is suitable for multifamily uses due to the proximity to Texas A&M university and Easterwood Airport. The lack of access creates a challenge to market the property as commercial. The proximity to the REZONING PDD APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 3 Page 48 of 59 departments of A&M that enroll graduate students (Vet school and Health Science Center) create a sub- market for one and 2-bedroom apartments. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property is actively being marketed for multifamily due to the proximity to Texas A&M and the Biomedical Corridor. List any other reasons to support this zone change. NA Maximum Building Height. 50 ft Proposed Drainage. The site has an existing detention pond which has been designed for an additional 45,000 sf of structure per the PAC notes. Additional detention will be provided if the development exceeds the allowable impervious cover. Variations Sought. The current PD is being revised to allow 199 units instead of 142 units. The number of bedrooms will be capped at 339. Also a parking reduction to 1 space per bedroom plus parking for staff. Community Benefits. All of the community benefits approved for the existing PD are being offered with this PD revision. Sustained Stability. The concept plan follows the character and precedent set by existing approved PD. This project will provide a Page 2 of 3 Page 49 of 59 need for one bedroom and 2 bedroom housing in the area. while encouraging multimodal transportation. Conformity. The concept plan follows the character and precedent set by existing approved PD. This project will provide a need for one bedroom and 2 bedroom housing in the area. while encouraging multimodal transportation. Compatibility with use. The property is the last remaining vacant lot in the subdivision, and the last lot to be developed in this intersection quadrant. The existing PD was approved after the lots to the north were already developed, which demonstrates the compatibility with the surrounding uses. Access to Streets. The concept plan shows a shared driveway through the existing adjacent development. The shared access is required by TXDOT and will reduce the conflict turning movements onto the highway. Public Improvements. The project will complete the multimodal trail and provide a connection between the development and Texas A&M. No other public improvements extension are required to support the Multifamily project. Public Health. The concept plan considers local and state guidelines for the public health safety and welfare and will not be detrimental to the public health. Safety. The completion of the Multimodal trail will provide a connection between this development and Research Park and Texas A&M, which will encourage pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Also using the shared driveway with the adjacent property will offer a safer access to the street and reduce conflict turning movements. Page 3 of 3 Page 50 of 59 ZONING EXHIBITVALLEY PARK APARTMENTS 404 AND 406 HARVEY MITCHELL PARKWAY SOUTHLOT 3R, VALLEY PARK CENTER (4.74 ACRES)VOL. 10020, PG. 67DRAWN BY:APPROVED BY:DATE:SHEET NO.:JOB NUMBER:SCALE:DPBDPB1 OF 1TBD1"=100'April 10, 2022BEAMONENGINEERINGBEXISTING 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTVOL. 7675, PG. 282EXISTING 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTVOL. 10020, PG. 67EXISTING 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTVOL. 7675, PG. 282EXISTING AVIATIONAND CLEAR ZONE ESMTVOL. 328, PG. 632EXISTING LIFTSTATION7.5' SIDE SETBACK15' FRONT SETBACK20' REAR SETBACK25' BUFFEREXISTINGDETENTION PONDACCESSDRIVEWAYPROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING SETBACKPROPOSED ZONING:PDDLEGENDEXISTING EASEMENTBATES-FLATO HOLDING LP107 E. 27TH STREETHOUSTON, TX 77008PH. (713) 355-4379WLS@WLS-INC.COMDEVELOPER:HARESH JETHANI AND KERSI ENGINEERHOUSTON GSH MANAGEMENT LLC9668 WESTHEIMER. STE 200-706HOUSTON TX 77063PH. (312) 404-6735HJETHANI@GMAIL.COMOWNER:APPLICANT:DANIEL BEAMONBEAMON ENGINEERING, LLC16172 BENCH LANEBRYAN, TX 77807PH. (979) 571-2407DANIEL@BEAMONENGINEERING.COMPROJECTLOCATIONVICINITY MAP1"=5000'FM 60SH 47FM 2818WELLBORN RDF&B ROADGEORGE BUSH DR Page 53 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-3883 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," SECTION 12-4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP," OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM CI COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TO PDD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.74 ACRES IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AT 404 HARVEY MITCHELL PARKWAY SOUTH, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF HARVEY MITCHELL PARKWAY SOUTH AND RAYMOND STOTZER PARKWAY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12- 4.2, "Official Zoning Map,"of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,Texas,be amended as set out in Exhibit "A", as described in Exhibit "B" and as depicted in the concept plan in Exhibit"C" and as further shown in Exhibit "D", attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars 2,000.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 11th day of May, 2017 APPRO D. A AY•R ATTEST: City Secretary APPROV li 1 City A o,ney Page 54 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-3883 Page 2 of 5 EXHIBIT "A" That Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12- 4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from CI Commercial Industrial to PDD Planned Development District: The Valley Park Center Subdivision, Lot 3R as depicted as follows: C'.1-fiI...A."4"n=rg.449.'t U•tel Nil"' ZritM141T..E.M.M WV/ Ln'B,BApes: 41R1., x<rcr 'uv"iSHiir f' SC Ili 4tEPP 22WACRES n'IxW.n:RAM'iAYWvr SIE.r ,I r .1t1_F* t> 1• StVor z I 1 y1 v..terr.WTAcarlw 7---- 6 CHtEU 4no.RATE RRA-r Ay el 24' d'NE AYM a SCOT)ISALuf.A-+0 II 1 I—M''WIL`NIL?r EATzatnr1VMalae:'A as)L' vs Aa'.v0 : .' I nit r4nivr 1 2tl'RA.U7 V1Y/rl EBF'-CRr ' I I r Ain rc say 04W--I 1 us Vc'.ad-ACCESS 1,A561rcvr cwt:GAP AOWS Lf;*227 Ai 770707 TO 071'cf MA..{TAR! tt Nos At-MSn6C h"T)A.AE}TTa, REZONING PLAN R+ ke 77(1025 SUMS, PANS 760527.1T.MA5 S4PFhEN.a.... JON,...(........ Page 55 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-3883 Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT "B" General: The Concept plan depicts Urban land use to allow for high-density multi-family. Due to the location, the limited access available and surrounding commercial uses, the proposed use of multi-family is not harmonious with the character of the surrounding area unless meritorious modifications are made. The surrounding area is mostly commercial development that consist of office use. The proposed development is intended to provide student housing in close proximity to the Texas A&M University campus. The PDD includes a variety of unit types and bedroom counts. Meritorious modifications and other requirements are included below. All other standards of the MF Multi-family district shall apply to the subject tract. Density: The project is capped at 142 dwelling units. Range of future building heights: The buildings will have a maximum building height of four stories. Drainage: The drainage from the project will enter the two existing ponds on the property and be detained before leaving the property boundary. Modifications to the ponds are proposed to allow them to act as detention. The applicant is requesting to reclaim a portion of the "flood prone" area. This portion of the property shown as "flood prone" is located in a Zone X area on the FEMA FIRM map panel 48041 C0305F. Meritorious Modifications The following modification is proposed through this rezoning request: Residential Zoning District: The proposed base zoning will be multi-family with a modification to limit the total commercial portion to a maximum of 2,000 square feet and with a limitation to restaurant uses only. MF Multi-Family zoning traditionally permits non- residential uses up to a maximum of 50 percent of the total floor area if incorporated into the residential structure, and this shall be allowed up to a maximum of 2,000 square feet. Page 56 of 59 0 M. P N y• VICI`. IIY MAP 1-'- r V oo 1---). a.e* au. ov 1:::== i' oo r - ice I . t 172'''''''' N' s\\......`: c.,) 1. 1. ' t. 1. G r • B Cil V 1 t ti jjjj/jj H H 7 j e Q , omav_ N" ar_-_ w - . r. rw— crv- rs• 1.--.' r : 3 r lvw= acrd i1. van mar no we mein 1' .< r`r ". Of,= r.. nVCW. K • 7 f1.-' p F C' i nu. mac oxr 4. W,.. memo a- wra, a, T t d 1 THE RESIDENCES AT UNIVERSITY P PDD CONCEPT PLAN CD 011.1. LIC11, 11. 11 778. 5 " YET NM.. n 78131 1111. 1171M. 11= Olt a res.. Valley Park Center. Lot 3R. 4. 740 Attaa ao- mo- rv. 113- 1160- 1300 112- 24, 110 of Conoco Station xw moor- ooz. March 27, 2017 0 CA Page 57 of 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-3883 Page 5 of 5 i EXHIBIT "D" o 0 9A, 0 a Sy ci O CoII 0 Q f‘4• To CL. 0 5 04 0, 13 k ca t . •:.\ : t.; as:.05,,i,r, . ' 1- 61-'1-1-1171114- i 0 ,,, 1 , -.,- ,g-f .1 c 47s- 0 , U r 0 0 Z 9 • 0 v RS) • N •0O X H o 6 Page 58 of 59 DRAWN BY:APPROVED BY:DATE:SHEET NO.:JOB NUMBER:SCALE:DPBDPB1 OF 1TBD1"=100'April 10, 2022BEAMONENGINEERINGBEXISTING 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTVOL. 7675, PG. 282EXISTING 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTVOL. 10020, PG. 67EXISTING 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTVOL. 7675, PG. 282EXISTING AVIATIONAND CLEAR ZONE ESMTVOL. 328, PG. 632EXISTING LIFTSTATIONPROPOSEDMULTI-USE PATH7.5' SIDE SETBACK15' FRONT SETBACK20' REAR SETBACK25' BUFFEREXISTINGDETENTION PONDGENERAL NOTES1.THE BASE ZONING FOR THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ISMULTIFAMILY.2.A MAXIMUM OF 2,000 SF TOTAL OF COMMERCIAL USE MAY BE UTILIZED WITHIN ANY OFTHE BUILDINGS.3.THE NON-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS SHALL APPLY ONLY IF COMMERCIALUSES ARE INCLUDED IN THE BUILDINGS.4.A MAXIMUM OF 339 BEDROOMS IN 199 DWELLING UNITS WILL BE PROVIDED.5.BUILDINGS WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF 4-STORIES, WITH NO ELEMENT REACHING MORE THAN50FT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. ALL BUILDING HEIGHTS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHAIRPORT REQUIREMENTS.6.PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED IN A PARKING GARAGE AND WITH SURFACE PARKING. THENUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED WILL BE 1.0 SPACE PER BEDROOM PLUS STAFFPARKING.7.A MULTI-USE PATH WILL BE EXTENDED THROUGH THE PROPERTY TO CONNECT THEADJACENT DEVELOPMENT WITH THE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AT THE FM 60 AND FM 2818INTERCHANGE. THE PATH WITH BE A MINIMUM OF 10' WIDE AND SHALL INCLUDE A 3 FTSHOULDER ON EACH SIDE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIONS.8.THE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTHWEST PROPERTY LINE WILL BE 25' WIDE AND WILLCONTAIN LANDSCAPING AND THE MULTI-USE PATH. THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITHTHE BUFFER STANDARDS SET FORTH IN UDO SECTION 7.7.F. A FENCE SHALL BECONSTRUCTED BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND CEMETERY.9.THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN IDENTIFIED IN FEMAFIRM MAP 48041C0305F, DATED APRIL 2, 2014.10.THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN THE FLIGHTS PATHS FOR TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS OFTHE EASTERWOOD AIRPORT AND MAY EXPERIENCE NOISE AND POSSIBLE VIBRATIONFROM AIRCRAFT.ACCESSDRIVEWAYCONCEPT PLANVALLEY PARK APARTMENTS 404 AND 406 HARVEY MITCHELL PARKWAY SOUTHLOT 3R, VALLEY PARK CENTER (4.74 ACRES)VOL. 10020, PG. 67 BATES-FLATO HOLDING LP107 E. 27TH STREETHOUSTON, TX 77008PH. (713) 355-4379WLS@WLS-INC.COMDEVELOPER:HARESH JETHANI AND KERSI ENGINEERHOUSTON GSH MANAGEMENT LLC9668 WESTHEIMER. STE 200-706HOUSTON TX 77063PH. (312) 404-6735HJETHANI@GMAIL.COMOWNER:APPLICANT:DANIEL BEAMONBEAMON ENGINEERING, LLC16172 BENCH LANEBRYAN, TX 77807PH. (979) 571-2407DANIEL@BEAMONENGINEERING.COMPROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING SETBACKLEGENDEXISTING EASEMENTFM 6 0 PROJECTLOCATIONVICINITY MAP1"=5000'SH 47FM 2818WELLBORN RDF& B R O A D GE O R G E B U S H D R Page 59 of 59